Management of acquired haemophilia A in severe Covid-19: Haemostatic bridging with emicizumab to keep the balance between bleeding and thrombosis.

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies blocking coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Haemostatic management of AHA and concomitant thrombotic risk is difficult. We cover the management of a 75-year-old male with severe Covid-19, a prothrombotic disease, and de novo AHA with severe muscle bleeding, a disease requiring highly thrombogenic haemostatic therapy and immunosuppression-a challenging combination. FVIII activity was measured using human and bovine reagents to differentiate between endo- and exogenous FVIII activity. For haemostatic control, recombinant human activated FVII was given, followed by emicizumab, as a less thrombogenic long-term haemostatic agent. Steroids were used as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Later, rituximab was used for inhibitor eradication. No thromboembolic events occurred, and bleeding was effectively controlled. Emicizumab achieved haemostatic balance in a patient under haemorrhagic and thrombogenic conditions. Individual risk assessment is needed to guide treatment decisions in patients threatened by simultaneous bleeding and thrombosis.

Hereditary thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and COVID-19: Impacts of vaccination and infection in this rare disease.

Introduction: Severe COVID-19 is associated with an important increase of von Willebrand factor and mild lowering of ADAMTS13 activity that may, in the presence of a strong inflammatory reaction, increase the risk of acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Although acute episodes of immune-mediated TTP associated with COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been reported, data about clinical evolution of hereditary TTP (hTTP) during the pandemic are scarce. Method: We conducted a survey among adult patients of the International Hereditary TTP Registry about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, COVID-19, and occurrence of acute hTTP episodes. Results: Of 122 adult hTTP patients invited to participate, 86 (70.5%) responded. Sixty-five had been vaccinated (75.6%), of which 14 had received in addition a booster, resulting in 139 individual vaccine shots. Although vaccinations in patients on plasma prophylaxis were done within 1 week of the last plasma infusion, all 23 patients treated with plasma on demand were vaccinated without prior plasma infusions. One patient on uninterrupted weekly plasma infusions presented within 3 days from his second vaccination with neurological symptoms and computed tomography scan 9 days later showed subacute ischemic/hemorrhagic frontal lobe infarction. A second male patient developed acute myocarditis after his second dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine. Twelve (14%) patients had COVID-19, associated with an acute hTTP episode in three of them: one patient had a transient ischemic attack, one a stroke, and a pregnant woman was hospitalized to intensify plasma treatment. Discussion: The risk of an acute episode triggered by COVID-19 seems higher than following vaccination in hTTP patients, who can be safely vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.

Subcutaneous Enoxaparin for Systemic Anticoagulation of COVID-19 Patients During Extracorporeal Life Support.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, with an inherent requirement for anticoagulation to avoid circuit thrombosis, is a key element in the treatment of respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. Anticoagulation remains challenging, the standard of care being intravenous continuous administration of unfractionated heparin. Yet regimens vary. Some intensive care units in our center have successfully used enoxaparin subcutaneously in recent years and throughout the pandemic. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure who had been systemically anticoagulated using either enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. The choice of anticoagulant therapy was based on the standard of the intensive care unit. Defined thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events were analyzed as study endpoints. Results: Of 98 patients, 62 had received enoxaparin and 36 unfractionated heparin. All hazard ratios for the thromboembolic (3.43; 95% CI: 1.08-10.87; p = 0.04), hemorrhagic (2.58; 95% CI: 1.03-6.48; p = 0.04), and composite (2.86; 95% CI: 1.41-5.92; p = 0.007) endpoints favored enoxaparin, whose efficient administration was verified by peak levels of anti-factor Xa (median: 0.45 IU ml-1; IQR: 0.38; 0.56). Activated partial thromboplastin time as well as thrombin time differed significantly (both p<0.001) between groups mirroring the effect of unfractionated heparin. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the successful use of subcutaneous enoxaparin for systemic anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our findings are to be confirmed by future prospective, randomized, controlled trials.

Successful treatment of vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT).

Cases of unusual thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca) have been reported. The term vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT) was coined to reflect this new phenomenon. In vitro experiments with VIPIT patient sera indicated that high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) competitively inhibit the platelet-activating properties of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine induced antibodies. Here, we report a case of a 62-year-old woman who had received this vaccine and developed VIPIT. She visited the emergency ward because of petechiae and hematomas. In the laboratory work-up, thrombocytopenia, low fibrinogen, elevated D-dimer, and positivity in the platelet factor 4/heparin-enzyme-immunoassay were present. Signs and symptoms of thrombosis were absent. Upon immediate therapy with non-heparin anticoagulation, high-dose IVIG, and prednisolone, laboratory parameters steadily improved and the patient was discharged from hospital without thrombotic complications. We conclude that early initiation of VIPIT treatment results in a swift response without thrombotic complications.

Risk of Clinically Relevant Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Early during the course of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, reports suggested alarmingly high incidences for thromboembolic events in critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, the clinical relevance of these events was not reported in several studies. Additionally, more recent research showed contradictory results and suggested substantially lower rates of venous thromboembolism. Thus, the aim of the present study was to summarize evidence on the incidence of clinically relevant venous thromboembolism (VTE)-defined as VTE excluding isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (PE) and distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT)-in adult critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the incidence of clinically relevant PE and/or DVT in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Scientific reports published in the English language between January and October 2020 were included. We conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate incidence estimates of clinically relevant VTE and bleeding events. We also performed exploratory meta-regression and subgroup analyses of different diagnostic approaches and additional factors that possibly influenced the incidence of these outcomes. Results: Fifty-four articles (5,400 patients) fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria, of which 41 had a high risk of bias. The majority of included patients were male, > 60 years, and overweight. Twenty-one studies reported the use of prophylactic doses of heparin. Pooled incidences for clinically relevant PE were estimated at 8% (95% CI, 4-11%), for proximal DVT at 14% (95% CI, 9-20%), and-after exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias-for the composite outcome of VTE at 18% (95% CI, 13-24%). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred at a rate of 6% (95% CI, 2-9%). Conclusions: We summarized currently available data on the rate of clinically relevant VTE in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Pooled incidence estimates were lower than those reported by previous review articles. In the absence of evidence-based anticoagulation guidelines for critically ill patients with COVID-19, the results of our study provide clinically important information for an individual risk-benefit assessment in this context. Registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO on June 22, 2020 (CRD42020193353; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).